Why are some Pressure Groups more successful than others?
Pressure groups are often sources of media attention in the UK, for many, their strikes and protests are widely covered and some even gain government responses. However are many pressure groups really that successful in influencing government policy and actions? If so why and is any specific group more successful than another?

Generally insider groups can have a greater impact on the government when compared to an outsider group, pressure groups which are promotional and insider can be some what assured that it will have the opportunity to influence the government whilst still gaining support. Promotional groups, which are open to all members of society, have a greater chance at influencing the government through protests , as their large numbers an sway the government. However its the need to be an insider group that is important, this gives you some what frequent meetings with government to discuss your ideas on their legislation and actions. If your pressure group is outsider and fights for an extreme ideology its likely, that not only will you lack support from the people, but you're very likely to be ignored or opposed by the government and Parliament.
Finally the methods used to influence the government can impact the successfulness of a pressure group. Some examples of methods commonly used include : Strikes, protests, rallies, lobbying, e-petitions and boycotts. The aim for a large majority of these is to disrupt a certain aspect of society, however almost all modern pressure groups go about achieving this in a non-violent manor. When done with a large number of people media attention can be gained , this increases peoples awareness of your cause , in turn giving you additional support from the people and even some MPs. Violent protests or rallies can end up loosing you support and the government is unlikely to want to negotiate with you. So aim to be peaceful, disrupt everyday life and try to work with the government to succeed as a pressure group.
No comments:
Post a Comment